array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
array.reverse();
array.toReversed();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.reverse() | |
Array.toReversed() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.reverse() | 60204372.0 Ops/sec |
Array.toReversed() | 31000490.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark test and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Test: Measuring the performance of Array.reverse()
vs Array.toReversed()
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares the performance of two different methods to reverse an array in JavaScript: Array.reverse()
and Array.toReversed()
.
Options Compared:
Array.reverse()
: This method reverses the order of elements in the array by swapping adjacent pairs of elements.Array.toReversed()
: This method returns a new reversed copy of the array, without modifying the original array.Pros and Cons:
Array.reverse()
: Pros:Array.toReversed()
: Pros:Other Considerations:
slice()
and reverse()
, are not compared in this test.Library Usage:
In the provided code snippets, there is no explicit library usage mentioned. However, it's worth noting that Array.reverse()
and Array.toReversed()
are built-in methods in JavaScript, so they don't rely on external libraries.
Special JS Features or Syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark test. It only employs standard JavaScript methods and data structures.
Alternatives:
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to reverse an array, here are a few options:
slice()
and reverse()
: This approach creates a new reversed copy of the array by slicing it from the beginning and reversing the slice.const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const reversedArr = arr.slice().reverse();
reduceRight()
with an initial value: This approach uses the reduceRight()
method to iterate over the array from right to left and accumulate the elements in a new reversed array.const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const reversedArr = arr.reduceRight((acc, curr) => [...acc, curr], []);
Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics or memory implications compared to the built-in Array.reverse()
and Array.toReversed()
methods.