<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.1.0.min.js"></script>
<div id="testElement" class="test class list classes"></div>
var el = $(".classes")[0];
var el = document.querySelector(".classes");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery | |
querySelector |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery | 1189575.1 Ops/sec |
querySelector | 4369048.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results.
Benchmark Description
The benchmark is designed to compare the speed of two approaches for selecting an element by its class in JavaScript:
getElementById
method (which doesn't work here since there's no id) and then queries the resulting element using the querySelector
function.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two options:
getElementById
(not used here) and querySelector
.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library: jQuery
jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. In this benchmark, it's used to select elements by class using the $(selector)
syntax. The library provides an abstraction layer over the native browser functionality, making it easier to work with elements.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
This benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond CSS selectors and native functions like querySelector
. However, some versions of JavaScript (like ECMAScript 2015+) might offer newer APIs for selecting elements by class, such as classList
on DOM elements.
Other Alternatives
If you need to select elements by class in a JavaScript context without using jQuery or vanilla JS with querySelector
, consider the following alternatives:
NodeList.prototype.item
or Array.prototype.forEach
, to iterate over elements and find matches.Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs and performance characteristics, so choose the one that best fits your needs.