<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.1.0.min.js"></script>
<div id="testElement" class="test class list classes"></div>
var el = $("div")[0];
var el = document.querySelector("div");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery | |
querySelector |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery | 1102439.6 Ops/sec |
querySelector | 5196811.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing the speed of getting an element by its ID using three different approaches:
$
function to select an element by its ID.document.getElementById()
method to get an element by its ID.querySelector
method to get an element by its ID.Pros and Cons of each approach
querySelector
method is a modern standard in JavaScript, providing efficient and flexible way to select elements.Library and purpose
The jQuery library is used in the test case for jQuery
. It provides a convenient way to manipulate HTML documents and handle various events. In this context, it's used to simplify the process of getting an element by its ID.
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested or used in these benchmark cases.
Alternative approaches
Other alternatives for selecting elements by their IDs could include:
document.querySelectorAll()
: This method returns a list of all elements that match the specified selector. It might be slower than querySelector
but can return multiple matches.document.getElementById()
with a wildcard: In some older browsers, it's possible to use a wildcard ("*"
) in getElementById
to select an element by its ID and then filter the results.Other considerations
Keep in mind that the test cases only compare the speed of getting an element by its ID. Other factors like memory usage or browser-specific optimizations might not be accounted for in this benchmark.
Overall, this benchmark provides a good starting point to understand the relative performance differences between these three approaches when it comes to selecting elements by their IDs.