<div class="hello" id="hello" data-hello="test">Hello</div>
document.querySelector('.hello');
document.querySelector('#hello');
document.querySelector('[data-hello]');
document.querySelector('[data-hello="test"]');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Class | |
ID | |
data attribute | |
data attribute with text |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Class | 4416641.0 Ops/sec |
ID | 2675042.5 Ops/sec |
data attribute | 2443761.2 Ops/sec |
data attribute with text | 2452141.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is testing different ways to select elements in HTML using JavaScript. The test cases are:
document.querySelector('.hello')
: Using class selectorsdocument.querySelector('#hello')
: Using ID selectorsdocument.querySelector('[data-hello]')
: Using data attributes (without specifying a value)document.querySelector('[data-hello="test"]')
: Using data attributes with a specific text valueOptions Compared
The benchmark is comparing the performance of using class selectors, ID selectors, and data attributes to select elements in HTML.
Pros and Cons
Libraries and Special JS Features
There doesn't appear to be any external libraries being used in this benchmark, but data attributes rely on the HTML5 specification, which is widely supported in modern browsers.
No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in the provided information.
Other Considerations
The benchmark only tests basic element selection using these methods. Other factors that could affect performance, such as:
Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to this benchmark, you might consider testing other aspects of HTML element manipulation, such as:
document.getElementById()
instead of document.querySelector()
querySelectorAll()
, getElementsByTagName()
)Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on your testing goals and requirements.