<div class="hello" id="hello" data-hello>Hello</div>
document.querySelector('.hello');
document.querySelector('#hello');
document.querySelector('[data-hello]');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Class | |
ID | |
data attribute |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Class | 4410482.0 Ops/sec |
ID | 4373286.0 Ops/sec |
data attribute | 3991797.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different approaches to select an element in HTML:
document.querySelector('.hello');
document.querySelector('#hello');
document.querySelector('[data-hello]');
Options Compared
The benchmark is comparing the performance of these three approaches on a specific HTML element with a class, ID, and data attribute set.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library and Purpose
There is no external library being used in this benchmark, as it only relies on the built-in JavaScript DOM API.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None mentioned, as all the approaches rely on standard JavaScript features.
Other Alternatives
If you need to select elements in HTML, other alternatives include:
document.querySelector()
with a CSS selector (e.g., document.querySelector('.hello')
)document.getElementById()
for IDs (e.g., document.getElementById('hello')
)document.getAttribute()
and setAttribute()
for attribute-based selectionBenchmark Preparation Code
The provided HTML preparation code creates an element with a class, ID, and data attribute set:
<div class="hello" id="hello" data-hello>Hello</div>
This allows the benchmark to test each approach on this specific element.
I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark!