const a = [];
for(let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
a.push(i);
}
a.splice(0, -1)
const a = [];
for(let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
a.push(i);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
test1234567 | |
test23456a |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
test1234567 | 246.4 Ops/sec |
test23456a | 249.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a platform for comparing JavaScript performance in various scenarios. The benchmark is designed to measure the execution speed of specific code snippets, specifically related to array operations.
Test Cases
There are two individual test cases:
const a = [];\r\n\r\nfor(let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {\r\n a.push(i);\r\n}\r\n\r\na.splice(0, -1)\r\n
push()
method and then removes the first element using the splice()
method with a negative count.const a = [];\r\n\r\nfor(let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {\r\n a.push(i);\r\n}\r\n\r\n
splice(0, -1)
.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two approaches:
push()
and splice()
.push()
, without the subsequent splice()
call.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
splice()
method, which can be slower than push()
.splice()
.Library and Purpose
None of the test cases use a specific library, but they do utilize built-in JavaScript functions like push()
and splice()
.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. They only rely on standard JavaScript methods and operators.
Other Alternatives
If you were to optimize this benchmark further, you could also consider using:
reduce()
to achieve the same result.However, in this particular benchmark, the difference between using push()
and splice()
is relatively small, and other optimizations like those mentioned above would likely have a more significant impact.