Benchmark: = vs > - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var n = 0;
while(true) {
    n++;
    if(n===100000) 
        break;
}

Tests:

= case
var n = 0; while(true) { n++; if(n===100000) break; }
> case
var n = 0; while(true) { n++; if(n>99999) break; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
= case
> case

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark test and explain what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test. In this case, there are two benchmarks:

1. `= case`: This benchmark tests the equality operator (=) in a simple while loop. The loop increments a variable `n` until it reaches 100000.
2. `> case`: This benchmark tests the greater than operator (>) in a similar while loop, but with a different condition: `if(n > 99999) break;`.

**Options Compared**

The two benchmarks are testing different operators:

* Equality operator (=)
* Greater than operator (>)
* Both operators are being compared to determine which one is faster.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Equality Operator (=)**:
	* Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not be the fastest option due to the overhead of comparing values.
2. **Greater Than Operator (>)**:
	* Pros: Often faster than equality operators since it can short-circuit the comparison.
	* Cons: May require more memory accesses or arithmetic operations.

In general, for simple conditions like this one, the difference in performance between these two operators might not be significant. However, if the condition is more complex or involves additional logic, the greater than operator might provide a slight performance boost.

**Library and Purpose**

There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. The test only uses built-in JavaScript functionality for the while loop and conditional statements.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript engines often optimize certain features like `let` and `const` declarations, which might affect performance in some cases.

**Other Alternatives**

Other alternatives to test these operators could include:

* Using a different data type (e.g., integers vs. floats)
* Adding additional conditions or logic to the loop
* Testing with a larger or smaller range of values
* Comparing the results across multiple browsers, operating systems, or devices

Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on the goals and requirements of the benchmark.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The preparation code for each test case is provided:

1. `= case`: This code initializes a variable `n` to 0 and enters an infinite while loop that increments `n` until it reaches 100000.
2. `> case`: Similar to the previous code, but with a greater than condition.

These codes are designed to be executed repeatedly by the benchmarking tool to measure performance.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/84.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 84 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
= case	12630.1 Ops/sec
> case	12681.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

= vs > (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: = case vs > case

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

= case

> case

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):