Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net!

Benchmark Definition Json

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which consists of:

1. Script Preparation Code: This section contains four functions that generate random hexadecimal strings:
   • genHexString1(len): Uses crypto.getRandomValues to generate an array of bytes, converts them to hex, and pads each byte with leading zeros.
   • genHexString2(len): Uses a predefined string hex to generate a random hex string by randomly selecting characters from this string.
   • genHexString3(len): Similar to genHexString1, but uses the window.crypto.getRandomValues API directly.
   • genHexString4(len): Generates a random hex string by randomly selecting characters from a predefined string hexChars.
   • genHexString5(len): Uses the btoa function to convert an array of bytes to a hex string, which is then truncated to the desired length.
2. Html Preparation Code: This section is empty, indicating that no HTML setup or preparation is required for these benchmarks.

Individual Test Cases

Each test case represents a single benchmark, where a specific function from the script preparation code is called with a fixed input length (20). The test cases are:

1. genHexString1
2. genHexString2
3. genHexString3
4. genHexString4
5. genHexString5

These test cases will measure the performance of each function under different conditions.

Comparison and Options

The comparison here is between five different approaches to generate random hexadecimal strings:

1. genHexString1: Uses crypto.getRandomValues to generate an array of bytes, converts them to hex, and pads each byte with leading zeros.
   • Pros: Fast and efficient, uses a well-established API for generating random numbers.
   • Cons: May require additional setup or dependencies (e.g., crypto module).
2. genHexString2: Uses a predefined string hex to generate a random hex string by randomly selecting characters from this string.
   • Pros: Simple and easy to implement, uses a small, known set of characters.
   • Cons: May produce less diverse or pseudo-random results due to the limited character set.
3. genHexString3: Similar to genHexString1, but uses the window.crypto.getRandomValues API directly.
   • Pros: Similar performance characteristics to genHexString1.
   • Cons: Same limitations as genHexString1.
4. genHexString4: Generates a random hex string by randomly selecting characters from a predefined string hexChars.
   • Pros: Similar simplicity to genHexString2, but with a larger character set.
   • Cons: May still produce less diverse or pseudo-random results due to the limited character set.
5. genHexString5: Uses the btoa function to convert an array of bytes to a hex string, which is then truncated to the desired length.
   • Pros: Convenient and easy to implement, uses a widely available API.
   • Cons: May be slower than other approaches due to the overhead of btoa.

Library Usage

None of the functions in the script preparation code explicitly use any external libraries. However, some browsers (like Chrome) provide APIs like crypto or btoa that are implemented as part of the browser's JavaScript engine.

Special JS Feature or Syntax

There is no explicit usage of special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark definition. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and built-in functions.

Other Alternatives

If you were to replace these benchmarks with alternative approaches, some options might include:

• Using a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator (CSPRNG) like the window.crypto.getRandomValues API.
• Employing a more efficient algorithm for generating random hexadecimal strings, such as the "incrementing counter" method.
• Using a library or framework that provides optimized and tested implementations of random number generation, such as random.org or jsrand.