var saltVal = crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(16));
function arrayBufferToHexString(bytes) {
bytes = new Uint8Array(bytes);
var hex = [];
for (let i = 0; i < bytes.length; i++) {
hex[i] = ("0" + bytes[i].toString(16)).slice(-2);
}
return hex.join("");
}
function bytesToHexString(bytes) {
bytes = new Uint8Array(bytes);
var hexBytes = [];
for (var i = 0; i < bytes.length; i++) {
hexBytes.push(("0" + bytes[i].toString(16)).slice(-2));
}
return hexBytes.join("");
}
arrayBufferToHexString(saltVal);
bytesToHexString(saltVal)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
directly set | |
push values |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
directly set | 1738722.5 Ops/sec |
push values | 1542617.1 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JavaScript function that converts an ArrayBuffer
to a hexadecimal string using two different approaches:
arrayBufferToHexString(bytes)
: This function takes an ArrayBuffer
as input, creates a new Uint8Array
from it, and then iterates over the array to convert each byte to a hexadecimal string.bytesToHexString(bytes)
: This function is similar to the first one but uses the push()
method to add the converted bytes to an array instead of directly assigning them.Comparison
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches on converting an ArrayBuffer
to a hexadecimal string. The comparison is done by executing each function with a salt value generated using the crypto.getRandomValues()
function, and measuring the execution time for each case.
Pros and Cons
arrayBufferToHexString(bytes)
):bytesToHexString(bytes)
):push()
method.Library
The benchmark uses the crypto
library, which is a built-in Node.js module for cryptographic functions. In this case, it's used to generate a random salt value using getRandomValues()
. The crypto
library provides various features like encryption, decryption, hashing, and randomness generation, making it a useful tool for security-related tasks.
Special JS feature/syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the use of let
and var
keywords is consistent throughout the code, which suggests that this benchmark was written to demonstrate the difference between these two keyword declarations.
Alternatives
If you want to measure the performance of similar operations, you might consider using other JavaScript functions or approaches, such as:
buffer.toString()
method (which is a built-in method for converting buffers to strings).Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be directly comparable to the original benchmark, as they may have different use cases or assumptions about the input data.