this.numberA = Math.random() * 1000;
this.numberB = Math.random() * 1000;
return Math.min(this.numberA, this.numberB);
if (this.numberA)
return this.numberA;
else
return this.numberB;
return this.numberA ? this.numberA : this.numberB
return this.numberA || this.numberB
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Math.min | |
if | |
ternary | |
OR |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Math.min | 1245192.2 Ops/sec |
if | 409182720.0 Ops/sec |
ternary | 408747200.0 Ops/sec |
OR | 407114400.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The test aims to measure the performance of different approaches to determine the smaller of two numbers: Math.min()
, an if-else statement, a ternary operator, and an OR operator. The goal is to find the quickest operation that achieves this task.
Options Compared
numberA
and numberB
and return the smaller one.|
) is being tested in this context, which returns 1 if either of the operands is non-zero.Pros and Cons
Math.min()
.Library
None explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, some browsers might use additional libraries or functions that are not part of the standard JavaScript implementation.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The benchmark does not seem to rely on any special features or syntax beyond what is typical for JavaScript (e.g., no ES6+ features like arrow functions, async/await, or template literals).
Alternatives
To measure performance differences in similar scenarios:
performance.now()
API to measure execution times.Keep in mind that benchmarking is an essential part of software development, and measuring performance differences can help you make informed decisions about code optimization strategies.