var arr = [Array(1000)].fill(0).map((_, i) => i);
var found = arr.indexOf(990) > -1;
var found = arr.includes(990);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
indexOf | |
includes |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
indexOf | 207870.2 Ops/sec |
includes | 3195024.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is represented by two test cases:
Array find with indexOf
: This test case checks the performance of the indexOf
method in JavaScript arrays.Array find with includes
: This test case checks the performance of the includes
method in JavaScript arrays.Options Compared
In both test cases, the following options are compared:
arr.indexOf(990)
: This option uses the traditional indexOf
method to search for a specific value (in this case, 990) within an array.arr.includes(990)
: This option uses the newer includes
method to check if an array contains a specific value.Pros and Cons of Different Approaches
indexOf
:includes
method due to its linear search algorithm.includes
method:indexOf
, more concise syntax, and widely adopted by modern browsers.Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, the Array.prototype.indexOf
method is used in both test cases, which is a built-in JavaScript method.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The new includes
method is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2019 (ES2020). It provides a more concise way to check if an array contains a specific value. The benchmark definition uses this method to compare its performance with the traditional indexOf
method.
Other Considerations
When choosing between the traditional indexOf
and the new includes
methods, consider the following factors:
indexOf
.includes
method is generally faster than traditional indexOf
, but this can vary depending on your specific use case.includes
method provides a more concise syntax, making it easier to write readable code.Alternative Approaches
If you need to compare performance between different search methods or want to test other array-related operations (like some
, every
, find
, etc.), consider the following alternatives:
I hope this explanation helps you understand the provided benchmark!