Benchmark: findIndex vs indexOf for simple array 2

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [];
for(let i = 0; i < 15000; i++) {arr[i] = i;}
var foo = Math.floor(Math.random() * 15000);

Tests:

findIndex
const index = arr.findIndex((element) => element === foo);
indexOf
const index = arr.indexOf(foo);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
findIndex
indexOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two methods to find an element in an array: `Array.prototype.findIndex()` and `Array.prototype.indexOf()`. The test case uses a simple array of 15,000 elements, each with a unique value between 0 and 14,999. A random index is generated, and the benchmark measures how many times each method can execute within a second.

**Options being compared:**

The two options being compared are:

1. `Array.prototype.findIndex()`: This method returns the index of the first element that satisfies the provided condition (in this case, finding an element equal to the randomly generated value). If no such element is found, it returns -1.
2. `Array.prototype.indexOf()`: This method returns the index of the first occurrence of a specified value in the array. If the value is not found, it returns -1.

**Pros and Cons:**

**`Array.prototype.findIndex()`**

Pros:

* More concise and expressive than `indexOf`
* Can be used to find all indices that satisfy a condition (by using an iterator)

Cons:

* Less performant for small arrays or exact matches
* Some older browsers may not support it

**`Array.prototype.indexOf()`**

Pros:

* Widely supported across browsers and versions
* More performant than `findIndex` for small arrays or exact matches

Cons:

* Less concise and less expressive than `findIndex`
* Returns -1 if the value is not found, whereas `findIndex` returns -1 when no elements satisfy the condition

**Library:**

None of the methods in question use any external libraries.

**Special JS feature/syntax:**

The benchmark uses JavaScript's built-in functions and syntax. No special features or syntax are used.

**Other considerations:**

To provide a more accurate comparison, it would be helpful to consider other factors such as:

* Array size distribution (e.g., is the array mostly contiguous or sparse?)
* Data type and structure (e.g., floating-point numbers, strings, etc.)
* Platform-specific optimizations or differences

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives for finding an element in an array could include:

1. `Array.prototype.includes()`: This method returns a boolean indicating whether the specified value is present in the array.
2. Using `Array.prototype.some()` and `Array.prototype.filter()`: These methods can be used to find all indices that satisfy a condition, but may have different performance characteristics.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as concise or expressive as `findIndex` and `indexOf`, respectively.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/87.0.4280.88 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 87 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
findIndex	1758.6 Ops/sec
indexOf	218150.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

findIndex vs indexOf for simple array 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: findIndex vs indexOf

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

findIndex

indexOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):