<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<!-- The above 3 meta tags *must* come first in the head; any other head content must come *after* these tags -->
<meta name="description" content="">
<meta name="author" content="">
<link rel="icon" href="../../favicon.ico">
<title>Starter Template for Bootstrap</title>
<!-- Bootstrap core CSS -->
<link href="../../dist/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- IE10 viewport hack for Surface/desktop Windows 8 bug -->
<link href="../../assets/css/ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- Custom styles for this template -->
<link href="starter-template.css" rel="stylesheet">
<!-- Just for debugging purposes. Don't actually copy these 2 lines! -->
<!--[if lt IE 9]><script src="../../assets/js/ie8-responsive-file-warning.js"></script><![endif]-->
<script src="../../assets/js/ie-emulation-modes-warning.js"></script>
<!-- HTML5 shim and Respond.js for IE8 support of HTML5 elements and media queries -->
<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="https://oss.maxcdn.com/html5shiv/3.7.3/html5shiv.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://oss.maxcdn.com/respond/1.4.2/respond.min.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<nav class="navbar navbar-inverse navbar-fixed-top">
<div class="container">
<div class="navbar-header">
<button type="button" class="navbar-toggle collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#navbar" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="navbar">
<span class="sr-only">Toggle navigation</span>
<span class="icon-bar"></span>
<span class="icon-bar"></span>
<span class="icon-bar"></span>
</button>
<a class="navbar-brand" href="#">Project name</a>
</div>
<div id="navbar" class="collapse navbar-collapse">
<ul class="nav navbar-nav">
<li class="active"><a href="#">Home</a></li>
<li><a href="#about">About</a></li>
<li><a href="#contact">Contact</a></li>
</ul>
</div><!--/.nav-collapse -->
</div>
</nav>
<div class="container">
<div class="starter-template">
<h1>Bootstrap starter template</h1>
<p class="lead">Use this document as a way to quickly start any new project.<br> All you get is this text and a mostly barebones HTML document.</p>
</div>
</div><!-- /.container -->
<!-- Bootstrap core JavaScript
================================================== -->
<!-- Placed at the end of the document so the pages load faster -->
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>window.jQuery || document.write('<script src="../../assets/js/vendor/jquery.min.js"><\/script>')</script>
<script src="../../dist/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<!-- IE10 viewport hack for Surface/desktop Windows 8 bug -->
<script src="../../assets/js/ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
var elements = document.querySelectorAll('li:not(.active)');
for(var i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
elements[i].style.display = 'none';
}
$('#navbar li:not(.active)').hide();
var elements = document.querySelectorAll('li:not(.active)');
$(elements).hide();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Plain JS | |
jQuery | |
Hybrid |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Plain JS | 37106.2 Ops/sec |
jQuery | 39959.6 Ops/sec |
Hybrid | 8872.7 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the test cases and explain what's being tested, along with their pros and cons.
Test Cases:
The test cases measure the performance of three different approaches to hide HTML elements:
var elements = document.querySelectorAll('li:not(.active)'); for(var i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) { elements[i].style.display = 'none'; }
$('#navbar li:not(.active)').hide();
var elements = document.querySelectorAll('li:not(.active)'); $(elements).hide();
What's being tested:
Options compared:
The test compares the performance of three different approaches:
document.querySelectorAll
and manual loop)$()
)document.querySelectorAll
for element selection and then calling hide()
on the resulting jQuery object)Pros and Cons:
document.querySelectorAll
for element selection and then leveraging jQuery's optimized hide method.Library usage:
In this test case, jQuery is used in all three approaches. The library provides an efficient way to select elements and manipulate their styles, making it a convenient choice for many developers.
Special JS feature or syntax:
None of the test cases explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax that's not widely supported. However, it's worth noting that document.querySelectorAll
is a relatively modern API (introduced in HTML5) and may not be supported by older browsers.
Overall, this test case aims to provide a simple yet informative benchmarking exercise for developers considering different approaches to hiding elements in their applications.