Benchmark: Selecting and Hiding - Plain JS vs. jQuery vs. Hybrid

HTML Preparation code:


<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
    <!-- The above 3 meta tags *must* come first in the head; any other head content must come *after* these tags -->
    <meta name="description" content="">
    <meta name="author" content="">
    <link rel="icon" href="../../favicon.ico">

    <title>Starter Template for Bootstrap</title>

    <!-- Bootstrap core CSS -->
    <link href="../../dist/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet">

    <!-- IE10 viewport hack for Surface/desktop Windows 8 bug -->
    <link href="../../assets/css/ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css" rel="stylesheet">

    <!-- Custom styles for this template -->
    <link href="starter-template.css" rel="stylesheet">

    <!-- Just for debugging purposes. Don't actually copy these 2 lines! -->
    <!--[if lt IE 9]><script src="../../assets/js/ie8-responsive-file-warning.js"></script><![endif]-->
    <script src="../../assets/js/ie-emulation-modes-warning.js"></script>

    <!-- HTML5 shim and Respond.js for IE8 support of HTML5 elements and media queries -->
    <!--[if lt IE 9]>
      <script src="https://oss.maxcdn.com/html5shiv/3.7.3/html5shiv.min.js"></script>
      <script src="https://oss.maxcdn.com/respond/1.4.2/respond.min.js"></script>
    <![endif]-->
  </head>

  <body>

    <nav class="navbar navbar-inverse navbar-fixed-top">
      <div class="container">
        <div class="navbar-header">
          <button type="button" class="navbar-toggle collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#navbar" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="navbar">
            <span class="sr-only">Toggle navigation</span>
            <span class="icon-bar"></span>
            <span class="icon-bar"></span>
            <span class="icon-bar"></span>
          </button>
          <a class="navbar-brand" href="#">Project name</a>
        </div>
        <div id="navbar" class="collapse navbar-collapse">
          <ul class="nav navbar-nav">
            <li class="active"><a href="#">Home</a></li>
            <li><a href="#about">About</a></li>
            <li><a href="#contact">Contact</a></li>
          </ul>
        </div><!--/.nav-collapse -->
      </div>
    </nav>

    <div class="container">

      <div class="starter-template">
        <h1>Bootstrap starter template</h1>
        <p class="lead">Use this document as a way to quickly start any new project.<br> All you get is this text and a mostly barebones HTML document.</p>
      </div>

    </div><!-- /.container -->


    <!-- Bootstrap core JavaScript
    ================================================== -->
    <!-- Placed at the end of the document so the pages load faster -->
    <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <script>window.jQuery || document.write('<script src="../../assets/js/vendor/jquery.min.js"><\/script>')</script>
    <script src="../../dist/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
    <!-- IE10 viewport hack for Surface/desktop Windows 8 bug -->
    <script src="../../assets/js/ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js"></script>
  </body>
</html>

Tests:

Plain JS
var elements = document.querySelectorAll('li:not(.active)'); for(var i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) { elements[i].style.display = 'none'; }
jQuery
$('#navbar li:not(.active)').each(function() { $(this).hide(); });
Hybrid
$(document.querySelectorAll('li:not(.active)')).each(function() { $(this).hide(); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Plain JS
jQuery
Hybrid

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of benchmarking!

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance of three approaches to select and hide elements in HTML: Plain JavaScript, jQuery, and Hybrid.

**Options Compared**

1. **Plain JavaScript**: Uses `document.querySelectorAll` to select all `li` elements that do not have the `active` class, and then loops through each element using a `for` loop to set its `display` style to `none`.
2. **jQuery**: Uses `$('#navbar li:not(.active)')` to select all `li` elements in the `#navbar` container that do not have the `active` class, and then uses `.each()` to iterate through each element and hide it using `.hide()`.
3. **Hybrid**: A combination of Plain JavaScript and jQuery approaches. It uses `document.querySelectorAll` like Plain JavaScript but wraps the loop in a jQuery-style `.each()` function.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Plain JavaScript**:
	+ Pros: Fast execution, no dependencies on external libraries.
	+ Cons: More verbose code, may not be as readable or maintainable.
* **jQuery**:
	+ Pros: Lightweight and easy to use, with a large community of developers who contribute to its ecosystem.
	+ Cons: Adds an extra dependency to the project, and its syntax can be unfamiliar to some developers.
* **Hybrid**:
	+ Pros: Combines the benefits of both approaches, leveraging the speed of Plain JavaScript while still using jQuery's concise syntax for iteration.
	+ Cons: May add unnecessary complexity due to the mixed approach.

**Library Usage**

The benchmark uses jQuery in its `Test Name` field and also employs a hybrid approach. Specifically, it wraps the loop in a jQuery-style `.each()` function but uses `document.querySelectorAll` like Plain JavaScript.

**Browser-Specific Results**

The latest benchmark results show the performance of each approach on Chrome 52 running on Mac OS X 10.11.3:

* **Plain JavaScript**: 19251 executions per second
* **jQuery**: 28603 executions per second (the fastest)
* **Hybrid**: 5798 executions per second

Overall, jQuery appears to be the fastest approach in this benchmark, likely due to its optimized and lightweight implementation.

**Takeaway**

When choosing between these approaches, consider your project's requirements, performance needs, and team expertise. If you need fast execution without dependencies on external libraries, Plain JavaScript might be a good choice. For ease of use and community support, jQuery is a great option. The Hybrid approach offers a balance between the two, but may add complexity to some projects.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/52.0.2743.116 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 52 on Mac OS X 10.11.3

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Plain JS	19251.1 Ops/sec
jQuery	28603.2 Ops/sec
Hybrid	5798.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Selecting and Hiding - Plain JS vs. jQuery vs. Hybrid (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Plain JS vs jQuery vs Hybrid

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Plain JS

jQuery

Hybrid

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):