<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
for (var i=0; i<100; i++){
var inDiv = document.createElement('span');
inDiv.id="s_"+i;
inDiv.innerHTML = 'bla';
inDiv.className = 'myclass';
frag.appendChild(inDiv);
}
document.body.appendChild(frag);
$('span.myclass').each(function () {
$(this).html('x');
});
$('span.myclass').each(function () {
this.innerHTML = 'y';
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery | |
pure JS |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery | 1171.2 Ops/sec |
pure JS | 2031.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark compares two approaches to update the innerHTML
property of HTML elements:
$
function to iterate over all <span>
elements with a class name of "myclass" and update their innerHTML
property to 'x'.innerHTML
property directly using the this
keyword, without any additional library.Options Compared:
The benchmark compares two options:
$
function to iterate over elementsinnerHTML
property directly using pure JavaScript syntaxPros and Cons of each approach:
Library:
The benchmark uses jQuery 1.12.4, which is a widely used JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of using jQuery versus pure JavaScript to update innerHTML
properties.
Other Alternatives:
If you want to explore alternative approaches, here are a few options:
forEach
, map
, or reduce
to iterate over elements and update their innerHTML
property.Keep in mind that the benchmark is focused on comparing the performance of using jQuery versus pure JavaScript, so these alternative approaches might not be directly relevant.