<div id="container"></div>
var container = document.getElementById("container");
var paragraph = document.createElement("p");
container.insertBefore(paragraph, null);
container.appendChild(paragraph);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
append | |
appendChild |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
append | 2436032.8 Ops/sec |
appendChild | 713161.7 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its various components.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test compares two approaches for inserting an HTML element (paragraph
) into another element (container
): insertBefore()
and appendChild()
methods.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code sets up a container element in the DOM:
var container = document.getElementById("container");
var paragraph = document.createElement("p");
This code creates an empty paragraph element and assigns it to the paragraph
variable. It also retrieves an existing container element from the DOM, which will serve as the parent element for the new paragraph.
Html Preparation Code
The HTML preparation code defines a basic HTML structure:
<div id="container"></div>
This code creates a simple container element with an ID of "container".
Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases in this benchmark:
append
: This test case uses the insertBefore()
method to insert the paragraph element before a null context (i.e., at the beginning of the container).appendChild
: This test case uses the appendChild()
method to append the paragraph element directly to the container.Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
insertBefore(paragraph, null)
: This approach inserts the paragraph element before a null context, effectively moving it to the beginning of the container.appendChild(paragraph)
: This approach appends the paragraph element directly to the container.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
insertBefore(paragraph, null)
:appendChild(paragraph)
:Library Usage
In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned in the provided code. However, some JavaScript engines may include internal libraries or optimizations that could affect the results of this benchmark.
Special JS Features/Syntax
This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax.
Other Alternatives
If you were to rewrite this benchmark with alternative approaches, here are a few options:
insertAdjacentHTML()
: This method can be used instead of insertBefore()
and appendChild()
. It's a more modern method that allows for dynamic insertion of HTML content.DOM manipulation libraries
: Some libraries, like jQuery or DOMManipulation.js, provide optimized DOM manipulation functions that might outperform the built-in methods in this benchmark.native Web API optimizations
: Modern browsers often include native optimizations and APIs (e.g., requestIdleCallback()
) for performance-critical tasks like DOM manipulation.These alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark code and may not provide a direct comparison with the original insertBefore()
and appendChild()
methods.