var n = 0;
while(true) {
n++;
if(100000==n)
break;
}
var n = 0;
while(true) {
n++;
if(100000===n)
break;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
test equality | |
test strict equality |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
test equality | 11398.3 Ops/sec |
test strict equality | 11240.7 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition represents a comparison between two JavaScript operators: ==
(loose equality) and ===
(strict equality). The question asks whether there is a performance benefit to replacing ==
with ===
.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
==
): This operator checks if the values of two variables are equal, without considering their data types.===
): This operator checks if both the value and data type of two variables are equal.Pros and Cons
Loose Equality (==
)
Pros:
Cons:
Strict Equality (===
)
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Special JS Feature
There is no library used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript has several special features that might be relevant to this benchmark, such as:
Number()
function: This function can convert a value to a number, which might affect the performance of loose equality.Other Alternatives
If you want to measure the performance difference between ==
and ===
in a different context, you could consider using other benchmarking frameworks or libraries. Some popular alternatives include:
These tools provide more advanced features and options for customizing your benchmarks.
In summary, the provided JSON data tests the performance difference between loose equality (==
) and strict equality (===
), highlighting the trade-offs between speed, reliability, and security.