var arr = ['홍길동', '소지섭']
var a = arr.concat(['최창현'])
var a = ['최창현', arr]
var a = arr.splice(0, 0, '최창현')
var a = arr.unshift('최창현')
var a = arr.push('최창현')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Array.prototype.splice | |
Array.prototype.unshift | |
Array.prototype.push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 2984658.8 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 6547616.5 Ops/sec |
Array.prototype.splice | 9383.6 Ops/sec |
Array.prototype.unshift | 1954.4 Ops/sec |
Array.prototype.push | 7675949.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test suite that compares the performance of different array manipulation methods in JavaScript:
Array.prototype.concat()
var a = ['최창현', ...arr]
)Array.prototype.splice()
Array.prototype.unshift()
Array.prototype.push()
Options compared
Each test case is designed to measure the performance of a specific array method, with different inputs and outputs. The options being compared are:
concat()
: concatenates an array with another array or a value...
): spreads an array's elements into another arraysplice()
: modifies an array by removing or adding elements at a specified indexunshift()
: adds one or more elements to the beginning of an arraypush()
: adds one or more elements to the end of an arrayPros and Cons
Here's a brief overview of each method's performance characteristics:
concat()
: Generally slower than other methods due to its overhead in creating a new array....
): Fast and efficient, but can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully.splice()
: Moderate performance, suitable for most use cases.unshift()
: Similar to concat()
in terms of performance, but may be slightly faster due to its lower overhead.push()
push()
: Generally the fastest method, especially for adding elements at the end of an array.Library and special JS features
In this benchmark, no libraries or special JavaScript features are used. The focus is on comparing the performance of built-in array methods.
However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers support additional array features like Array.prototype.at()
, which can affect performance. Additionally, some older browsers may not support certain array methods or features, which could impact benchmark results.
Other alternatives
If you're looking for alternative benchmarks or testing frameworks for JavaScript, here are a few options:
micro-benchmark
(npm) or benchmark
(GitHub): These libraries provide a simple way to create and run microbenchmarks.Keep in mind that each benchmark suite has its own strengths and weaknesses, and some may be more suitable for specific use cases than others.