let a = []
a.push(1)
let a = []
a = [a, 1]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push | |
Spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push | 86779792.0 Ops/sec |
Spread | 44935368.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in this benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases for measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmarks compare the execution times of two approaches:
Array.prototype.push
: This approach uses the push()
method to add elements to an empty array....a, 1
): This approach uses the spread operator to create a new array with the existing elements and then adds a new element.Options compared
The benchmark is comparing two options:
Array.prototype.push()
method to add an element to an array....
) to create a new array with existing elements and then adding a new element.Pros and cons of each approach:
Array.prototype.push()
:...
):Array.prototype.push()
for large arraysLibrary and its purpose
There is no specific library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, both approaches use native JavaScript features:
Array.prototype.push()
: This method is part of the Array prototype in JavaScript....
): This operator is a built-in feature in modern JavaScript.Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided JSON. Both approaches use standard JavaScript methods and operators.
Other alternatives
If you were to rewrite this benchmark, other alternatives could include:
Array.concat()
instead of spread operatorArray
constructor (new Array(0).push(1)
)These alternative approaches would allow you to explore more variations and compare their performance in this benchmark.
Benchmark preparation code
The provided JSON includes two script preparation codes:
let a = [];
a.push(1);
and
let a = [];
a = [...a, 1];
These codes are used as the starting points for the benchmark measurements.