Benchmark: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator - with Arrays of Objects (Updated Oct 2020)

Tests:

Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ { 'ten': 10 }, { 'six': 6 }, {'nested': { 'five': 5 }} ]; var other = [ { 'one': 1 }, { 'two': 2 } ].concat(params);
spread operator (spread at head)
var params = [ { 'ten': 10 }, { 'six': 6 }, {'nested': { 'five': 5 }} ]; var other = [ ...params, { 'one': 1 }, { 'two': 2 } ];
spread operator (spread at tail)
var params = [ { 'ten': 10 }, { 'six': 6 }, {'nested': { 'five': 5 }} ]; var other = [ { 'one': 1 }, { 'two': 2 }, ...params ];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator (spread at head)
spread operator (spread at tail)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 15_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/102.0.5005.87 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile iOS 102 on iOS 15.5

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.prototype.concat	17643870.0 Ops/sec
spread operator (spread at head)	23375750.0 Ops/sec
spread operator (spread at tail)	23330750.0 Ops/sec

Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator - with Arrays of Objects (Updated Oct 2020) (version: 0)

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

Comparing performance of: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (spread at head) vs spread operator (spread at tail)

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.prototype.concat

spread operator (spread at head)

spread operator (spread at tail)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A