var params = [ "hello", true, { 'five': 5 } ];
var other = [ { 'one': 1 }, { 'two': 2 } ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, { 'five': 5 } ]
var other = [ params, { 'one': 1 }, { 'two': 2 } ]
var params = [ "hello", true, { 'five': 5 } ]
var other = [ { 'one': 1 }, { 'two': 2 }, params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator (spread at head) | |
spread operator (spread at tail) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 9369497.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator (spread at head) | 19395658.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator (spread at tail) | 19075528.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for concatenating arrays: Array.prototype.concat
(a traditional method) and the spread operator (...
). The test aims to determine which approach is faster, taking into account the order in which elements are appended to the array.
Options Compared
There are three options being compared:
...
) with the first element at the head of the new array....
) with the elements at the end of the original array.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each approach:
concat()
or other array methods on the resulting array.Library and Syntax
In this benchmark, the following library is used:
No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to concatenating arrays, here are a few options:
concat()
or the spread operator, you can use push()
to add elements to an array and then pass the resulting array as an argument to another function.slice()
on the original array and passing in a range of indices. Then, you can use the spread operator to concatenate the resulting slice with other arrays.These alternatives might be useful in specific situations or for educational purposes, but they are not typically used in production code due to their performance overhead.
I hope this explanation helps!