var x = Math.pow(54,4);
var y = 54*54*54*54
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
pow | |
mult |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
pow | 6969558.5 Ops/sec |
mult | 753244032.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark data and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, library usage, special JavaScript features or syntax, and alternatives.
Benchmark Definition and Test Cases
The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to calculate the power of a number:
Math.pow(x, 4)
: Using the pow
method from the Math object.x * x * x * x
: Manual multiplication (using four multiplications).Both test cases are identical, except for how the base value 54
is calculated.
Comparison of Options
The two approaches differ in:
Pros and Cons
Math.pow(x, 4)
: Library Usage
The Math
library is used in both test cases. The pow
method is a built-in function that calculates the power of a number, making it an efficient option for this benchmark.
Special JavaScript Features or Syntax
None mentioned in the provided data, but keep in mind that some JavaScript features might affect performance, such as:
However, these specifics are not present in this particular benchmark.
Alternatives
Other approaches to calculate x^4
could be:
x * x * x * x
is one way, but you might find alternative formulas (e.g., Math.sqrt(x) * Math.sqrt(x) * Math.sqrt(x) * Math.sqrt(x)
).**
operator with two arguments: This is a shorthand for exponentiation: x ** 4
.However, since these alternatives are not included in the benchmark, we can't directly compare their performance.
In summary, this benchmark tests two basic approaches to calculate the power of a number using JavaScript's built-in functions and manual multiplication. The results show that using the Math.pow(x, 4)
method is faster than manual multiplication.