Benchmark: Lodash vs Native reduce on lqrgeobject

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.obj = {};

for (var i = 0, len = 1001; i < len; i++) {
  var arr = []
  obj['key' + i] = arr
  for (var n = 0, len = 1001; n < len; n++) {
    arr.push({ ['key' + n]: n });
  }
}

Tests:

Lodash
_.reduce(obj, (acc, val, key) => { acc[key] = val.map(d => ({ label: key, value: val })); return acc; }, {})
Native
Object.entries(obj).reduce((acc, [key, val]) => { acc[key] = val.map(d => ({ label: key, value: val })); return acc; }, {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; POCO F1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.127 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 85 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	30.1 Ops/sec
Native	24.9 Ops/sec

Lodash vs Native reduce on lqrgeobject (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Native

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A