var string = parseFloat((3/2).toFixed(4)).toString();
var string = (3/2).toFixed(4).replace(/\.?0*$/, '');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
parseFloat() | |
regex |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
parseFloat() | 19502350.0 Ops/sec |
regex | 12818797.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JS features, and other considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to convert a float number with limited precision to a string: using parseFloat()
versus a regular expression.
Options Compared
parseFloat()
: This function parses a string representing a floating-point number and returns its decimal value as a number.toFixed(4)
).Pros and Cons
parseFloat()
:parseFloat()
Library Usage There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark.
Special JS Features There are no special JavaScript features used in this benchmark (e.g., async/await, promises).
Other Considerations
toFixed(4)
method to limit precision to 4 decimal places.Alternatives If you need to optimize similar operations in your code, consider the following alternatives:
lodash
or underscore
, which provide optimized implementations of regex patterns and other string operations. Intl.NumberFormat()
API (supported in modern browsers) to format numbers with limited precision.Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal coding style preferences.