const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = {
firstObject,
secondObject
};
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | |
Using Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | 2138404.8 Ops/sec |
Using Object.assign | 5239895.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what is being tested in this benchmark.
What is being tested:
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for merging objects in JavaScript:
...
): This syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018) and allows you to merge objects by spreading their properties onto another object.Options being compared:
...
)Pros and Cons of each approach:
Spread Operator (...
)
Pros:
Cons:
Object.assign() method
Pros:
Cons:
Object.assign()
instead of just ...
)Other considerations:
The benchmark assumes that both approaches are being used without any additional libraries or modifications, except for the presence of modern JavaScript features (like ES2018 syntax). It's also worth noting that there may be differences in performance between these two methods due to the way they are implemented by different browsers and Node.js versions.
Library/Function usage:
The benchmark uses the Object
function from the global object, which is a built-in JavaScript function. There are no external libraries or modules required for this benchmark.
There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that modern browsers and Node.js versions support many advanced JavaScript features, such as async/await, generators, and classes, but these are not explicitly tested here.
Alternatives:
If you need to compare performance of other object merging approaches, some alternatives could be:
_.merge()
functionR.merge()
functionPlease note that the benchmark is focused on comparing two specific approaches (spread operator and Object.assign()), so it's hard to consider alternative approaches without modifying the benchmark itself.
I hope this explanation helps!