Benchmark: Regexp vs. Includes vs. IndexOf

Tests:

Regexp
console.log(/s/.test('test'))
IndexOf
console.log('test'.indexOf('s') !== -1)
Includes
console.log('test'.includes('s'))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Regexp
IndexOf
Includes

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_2) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/13.0.4 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 13 on Mac OS X 10.15.2

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Regexp	660952.1 Ops/sec
IndexOf	639860.9 Ops/sec
Includes	616046.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll explain the benchmark in detail.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares three different approaches to check if a substring exists within a string: regular expressions (`/s/.test('test')`), `indexOf()` method, and `includes()` method.

These three methods are compared because they have different performance characteristics, and the benchmark aims to determine which one is faster in various scenarios.

**Options being compared**

1. **Regular Expressions (Regexp)**: This approach uses a regular expression pattern (`/s/`) to match the substring `'s'` within the string `'test'`. The `/.test()` method returns a boolean value indicating whether the pattern matches.
2. **indexOf() Method**: This approach uses the `indexOf()` method of the string object, passing the substring `'s'` as an argument. If the substring is found, the method returns its index; otherwise, it returns -1.
3. **includes() Method**: This approach uses the `includes()` method of the string object, passing the substring `'s'` as an argument. If the substring exists within the string, the method returns a boolean value indicating this.

**Pros and Cons**

*   **Regular Expressions (Regexp)**:
    *   Pros: Can match complex patterns, is widely used in various libraries and frameworks.
    *   Cons: Performance can be slower due to the overhead of compiling regular expressions. It also requires more memory for pattern compilation.
*   **indexOf() Method**:
    *   Pros: Fastest approach among the three, as it's optimized for string comparisons.
    *   Cons: May not be as flexible as Regexp or includes(), as it only searches for a specific substring at a specific index.
*   **includes() Method**:
    *   Pros: More readable and concise than Regexp, efficient enough for simple use cases. It's also part of the modern JavaScript standard.
    *   Cons: May be slower than indexOf() in performance-critical scenarios due to its overhead.

**Library/ Framework consideration**

In this benchmark, none of the approaches rely on a specific library or framework other than built-in JavaScript methods and regular expressions. However, the usage of `includes()` method is more modern and part of the ECMAScript standard (ES6+), which might make it more readable and efficient for newer browsers.

**Special JS feature/Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on the performance comparison of three different string comparison approaches.

**Alternatives**

If you want to create similar benchmarks, consider testing other string comparison methods like:

1.  **Substring replacement**: Using a function that replaces all occurrences of a substring with another value.
2.  **String concatenation and loop iteration**: Measuring the time taken by concatenating strings in a loop or using a specific concatenation technique (e.g., `join()`).
3.  **Regular expression with different flags**: Comparing performance with different regular expression flags (e.g., `g` for global matching, `m` for multiline mode).

Creating benchmarks helps to identify performance hotspots and optimize code, making your applications faster and more efficient.

Related benchmarks:

Regexp vs. Includes vs. IndexOf (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Regexp vs IndexOf vs Includes

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Regexp

IndexOf

Includes

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):