<div id="num"></div>
var el = document.getElementById('num');
var decimal = 30.0;
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
decimal += (i / 1000);
el.innerHTML = parseInt(decimal, 10);
}
var decimal = 30.0;
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
decimal += (i / 1000);
el.innerHTML = decimal.toFixed();
}
var decimal = 30.0;
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
decimal += (i / 1000);
el.innerHTML = ~~decimal;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
parseInt | |
toFixed | |
~~ |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
parseInt | 112.6 Ops/sec |
toFixed | 103.5 Ops/sec |
~~ | 132.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different methods for formatting numbers:
parseInt
: converting a number string to an integertoFixed
: rounding a number to a fixed decimal place~~
: the bitwise NOT operator, which can be used to truncate a number (e.g., -5 ~~ 10
is equivalent to -5
)The test cases are simple:
Now, let's discuss the pros and cons of each approach:
parseInt
Pros: Fast, lightweight, and widely supported.
Cons: Can be brittle if the input string is not in the expected format. If the first character is not a digit, parseInt
will return 0, which might not be what you want.
toFixed
Pros: More flexible than parseInt
, as it can handle a wider range of input formats. It's also more readable and easier to understand.
Cons: Can be slower than parseInt
, especially for large numbers or decimal places.
~~
Pros: Very lightweight, as it only requires a single operation (bitwise NOT).
Cons: Can be tricky to read and understand, especially if you're not familiar with the bitwise NOT operator. It can also produce unexpected results if the input value is negative or zero.
In terms of performance, the ~~
approach tends to be the fastest, followed closely by parseInt
, and then toFixed
. However, the difference between these methods might not be significant for most use cases.
As for the libraries used in this benchmark, none are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers have built-in functions like Number.prototype.toFixed()
and parseInt()
with support for decimal places.
There are other alternatives to these three approaches:
: Similar to
toFixed, but without the precision control. It's also faster than
toFixed` but might not produce the same results for all edge cases.Keep in mind that these alternatives come with their own trade-offs and potential performance impacts.
I hope this explanation helps!