let temp = []
var params = ['1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1',]
params.forEach(p => temp = temp.concat([p]))
let temp = []
var params = ['1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1',]
params.forEach(p => temp = [temp, p])
let temp = []
var params = ['1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1','1',]
params.forEach(p => temp.push(p))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 388672.8 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 1224644.9 Ops/sec |
Push | 16474246.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare three different approaches for appending elements to an array: concat()
, the spread operator (...
), and push()
.
Options Compared
Pros and Cons
concat()
.Library Usage
None of the test cases use any external libraries. The tests are self-contained and only rely on JavaScript's built-in functions.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The spread operator (...
) is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's not supported in older browsers, which might affect the benchmark results.
Other Considerations
When dealing with large arrays or performance-critical code, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between memory usage and execution speed. Creating a new array can be expensive, especially for large datasets.
In modern JavaScript development, using the spread operator or push()
is generally recommended over concat()
, as it avoids creating unnecessary copies of the original data.
Alternatives
If you need to support older browsers or want to explore other approaches, consider these alternatives:
Keep in mind that each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.