Benchmark: Modern Date Libraries

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/2.0.0-alpha0/date_fns.min.js" integrity="sha512-0kon+2zxkK5yhflwFqaTaIhLVDKGVH0YH/jm8P8Bab/4EOgC/n7gWyy7WE4EXrfPOVDeNdaebiAng0nsfeFd9A==" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.25.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/dayjs@1.8.21/dayjs.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.__date__ = new Date();
window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';

Tests:

Luxon
var actual = luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(__date__).toFormat('yyyy/MM/dd'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
Date-fns
var actual = dateFns.format(__date__, 'YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
Dayjs
var actual = dayjs(__date__).format('YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Luxon
Date-fns
Dayjs

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/118.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 118 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Luxon	112656.3 Ops/sec
Date-fns	126471.7 Ops/sec
Dayjs	96911.5 Ops/sec

Modern Date Libraries (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Luxon vs Date-fns vs Dayjs

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Luxon

Date-fns

Dayjs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A