"lorem ipsum".split('').map((char, index) => index % 2 ? char.toUpperCase() : char).join('');
"lorem ipsum".replace(/(.)(.)/g, (substring, m1, m2) => {
return m1 + m2.toUpperCase();
});
const value = "lorem ipsum"
let result = '';
let toggle = false;
for(let i = 0; i < value.length; i++) {
if (toggle) {
result = result + value.charAt(i);
} else {
result = result + value.charAt(i).toUpperCase();
}
toggle = !toggle;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Split | |
replace | |
For |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Split | 1941448.2 Ops/sec |
replace | 1156336.5 Ops/sec |
For | 3937611.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark.
Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark definition contains three test cases: Split
, replace
, and For
. Each test case measures the performance of different approaches for achieving the same result.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the benchmark. It contains the following properties:
Name
: The name of the benchmark, which is "Uppercase 2".Description
: An empty string.Script Preparation Code
: An empty string, indicating that no script preparation code is required.Html Preparation Code
: An empty string, indicating that no HTML preparation code is required.Test Cases
The test cases are defined in the "Individual test cases" section. Each test case has two properties:
Benchmark Definition
: A JavaScript expression that defines the benchmark. This expression represents the operation to be performed and its performance characteristics.Test Name
: The name of the test case, which is used to identify the results.Let's analyze each test case:
The Split
test case measures the performance of splitting a string using the .split()
method.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared in this test case:
.split()
, where the separator is not provided././g
as the separator, which matches any single character (except newline) globally.Pros and Cons
Using the default behavior of .split()
:
Using the regular expression /./g
:
The replace
test case measures the performance of replacing characters in a string using the .replace()
method.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared in this test case:
/(.)(.)/g
, where (.)
is a capture group that matches any single character.Pros and Cons
Using the regular expression /(.)(.)/g
:
Custom implementation:
The For
test case measures the performance of iterating over a string character by character using a for
loop.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared in this test case:
for
loop that iterates over the characters.Pros and Cons
Using a simple for
loop:
Custom implementation:
Library Used
None of the test cases use a library explicitly. However, some libraries may be implied by the usage of certain methods or features (e.g., regex).
Special JavaScript Features or Syntax
The custom implementation in the For
test case uses a special syntax for toggling variables (let toggle = !toggle;
). This syntax is not enabled by default and requires a specific configuration to work.
Alternatives
If you need to measure the performance of string manipulation operations, you can consider using other alternatives such as:
indexOf()
, slice()
, or substring()
regex
or regex-optimize
Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on the specific requirements and use cases of your application.