Benchmark: [sited] Lodash vs native filter

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/node-uuid/1.4.8/uuid.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

// Generate random collection
var data = []
for (var i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
    data.push({
        name: uuid.v4(),
        number: Math.random() * 1000,
    })
}

Tests:

filter-native
data.filter(function (o) {return o.name[0] === '0' && o.number > 990})
filter-lodash
_.filter(data, function (o) {return o.name[0] === '0' && o.number > 990})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
filter-native
filter-lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.102 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 85 on Mac OS X 10.15.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
filter-native	20356.5 Ops/sec
filter-lodash	33738.8 Ops/sec

[sited] Lodash vs native filter (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: filter-native vs filter-lodash

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

filter-native

filter-lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A