const a = (x, y) => x + y;
a(3, 4);
function a(x, y) {
return x + y;
}
a(3, 4);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arrow | |
function |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arrow | 93874008.0 Ops/sec |
function | 95177592.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its options.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is called "arrow function vs function" and it measures the performance difference between using arrow functions and regular functions in JavaScript.
Options Compared
There are two main options being compared:
const a = (x, y) => x + y;
to define a small anonymous function.function a(x, y) { return x + y; }
to define a named function.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library and Purpose
There is no library being used explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that both arrow functions and regular functions are part of the ECMAScript standard and do not require any additional libraries to be supported by modern browsers.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
This benchmark uses a feature called Arrow Functions, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). Arrow functions provide a concise way to define small, anonymous functions. The syntax const a = (x, y) => x + y;
is used to define an arrow function that takes two arguments and returns their sum.
Other Alternatives
In addition to the two options being compared in this benchmark, other alternatives for creating small, anonymous functions include:
const a = () => x + y;()
is executed immediately after definition.const a = function(x, y) { return x + y; }
can be used to define a named or anonymous function.In summary, the "arrow function vs function" benchmark measures the performance difference between using arrow functions and regular functions in JavaScript. Arrow functions provide a concise way to define small, anonymous functions, but may be less readable than regular functions.