let counter = 1e5;
const arr = [];
while(counter--) {
for (let i=0; i< 30; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(i) === -1) {
arr.push(i);
}
}
}
arr
let counter = 1e5;
const set = new Set();
while(counter--) {
for (let i=0; i < 30; i++) {
set.add(i);
}
}
[set];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array Unique | |
Set Unique |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array Unique | 10.7 Ops/sec |
Set Unique | 29.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark data and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes two test cases:
Array.indexOf()
to check for uniqueness versus adding elements to an empty array.Options being compared
The two options being compared are:
Array.indexOf()
to check for uniqueness (Array Unique)Pros and Cons of each approach:
Array.indexOf()
: This method has a time complexity of O(n) in the worst case, where n is the number of elements being checked. This can be slow for large arrays. Additionally, it creates an extra step that involves searching through the array to find the index of the element.Array.indexOf()
because it avoids the extra search step.Library used:
The test case "Set Unique" uses a built-in JavaScript Set
object, which is a data structure that automatically eliminates duplicates and provides fast membership testing. The purpose of using a set is to quickly add elements and check for uniqueness without having to iterate through an array.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being used in these benchmark cases. They are straightforward examples of basic array manipulation and set operations.
Other alternatives:
If you wanted to test alternative approaches, here are a few options:
Array.prototype.includes()
instead of Array.indexOf()
Map
or a SortedSet
instead of an arrayKeep in mind that these alternatives would likely change the performance characteristics of the test cases, and may not be as straightforward to implement.
Benchmark preparation code:
Since there is no script preparation code provided, I assume that the benchmark is simply a matter of executing the JavaScript code snippets. The while
loop and nested for
loop create a large array or set of elements, which are then used to test the performance of each approach.
Latest benchmark result:
The latest benchmark results show that the Set Unique approach (adding elements to an empty set) is faster than the Array Unique approach (using Array.indexOf()
). This makes sense given the time complexity of each method.