let params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
params = params.concat(1);
let params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
params = [params, 1]
let params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
params.push(1)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 13396921.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 11617158.0 Ops/sec |
Push | 57159352.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition The benchmark definition represents a specific JavaScript operation that is being measured. In this case, there are three test cases:
Array.prototype.concat
: This test case measures the performance of concatenating an array with another value using the concat()
method.spread operator
: This test case measures the performance of using the spread operator (...
) to add a new value to an existing array.Push
: This test case measures the performance of adding a new value to an array using the push()
method.Options Compared The benchmark is comparing three different approaches:
concat()
: Using the concat()
method to add a new value to the end of an array....
): Using the spread operator to create a new array by adding a new value to the existing array.push()
method to add a new value to the end of an array.Pros and Cons
concat()
:...
):Other Considerations
Special JS Features/Syntax
None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.
Libraries Used
None explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, some JavaScript engines (like V8) may have built-in optimizations or features that affect the execution speed of these operations.
If you're interested in exploring alternatives, here are a few options:
Feel free to ask if you'd like me to explain any of these alternatives further!