<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var arr = new Array(10000000).fill(123);
var arr2 = []
for(i=0; i<1000000; i++) {
var ascii = Math.floor((Math.random() * 25) + 97);
var str = String.fromCharCode(ascii);
arr2.push(str);
}
_.clone(arr);
_.clone(arr2);
[arr];
[arr2];
arr.map(x => x);
arr2.map(x => x);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash clone | |
Spread Operator | |
Array.map |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash clone | 1.3 Ops/sec |
Spread Operator | 1.1 Ops/sec |
Array.map | 1.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark is comparing the performance of three different methods to clone or transform arrays:
clone()
method for creating shallow copies of objects, including arrays....
): A syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows spreading elements of an array into a new array.Options Compared:
The benchmark is comparing the performance of these three options:
clone()
method...
)Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
clone()
method:...
):Library Used:
In this benchmark, Lodash is used as a library for its clone()
method. The Html Preparation Code
section includes a script tag referencing the Lodash library, ensuring it is loaded and available for use in the benchmark.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
The spread operator (...
) is a syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows spreading elements of an array into a new array. This feature is not supported in older browsers, making it less suitable for cross-browser compatibility.
In summary, this benchmark compares the performance of three different methods to clone or transform arrays: Lodash's clone()
method, Array.prototype.map(), and the spread operator (...
). The pros and cons of each approach are highlighted, as well as the library used (Lodash) and any special JavaScript features/syntax (spread operator).