Benchmark: Native vs Lodash.js vs Ramda (filter)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.6/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var max1 = 100000; // 100,000 (100 Thousand)
var max2 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)
var max3 = 100000000; // 100,000,000 (100 Million)

var arr1 = [];
//for (var i = 0; i <= max1; i++) { arr1.push(i); }

var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { arr2.push(i); }

var arr3 = [];
//for (var i = 0; i <= max3; i++) { arr3.push(i); }

function filterFn (element) {
	return element === 900;
}

Tests:

Native filter
arr2.filter(filterFn);
Lodash.js filter
_.filter(arr2, filterFn);
Ramda filter
R.filter(filterFn, arr2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native filter
Lodash.js filter
Ramda filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/95.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 95 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native filter	56.1 Ops/sec
Lodash.js filter	57.4 Ops/sec
Ramda filter	62.0 Ops/sec

Native vs Lodash.js vs Ramda (filter) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native filter vs Lodash.js filter vs Ramda filter

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Native filter

Lodash.js filter

Ramda filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A