Benchmark: Math.pow vs for loop for integer powers

HTML Preparation code:


<div id='aaa1'></div>

Script Preparation code:

function MYpow(dddn1,dddn2){
  var dddn3=1;
  while(dddn2>0){
    dddn3*=dddn1;dddn2--;
  }
  return dddn3;
}
function MYpow2(dddn1,dddn2){
  var dddn3=1;
  while(dddn2>0){
    if(dddn2-dddn2^1){dddn3*=dddn1;dddn1*=dddn1;}
    dddn2=dddn2>>1;
  }
  return dddn3;
}

Tests:

Math.pow
var x=[]; for(var i=0;i<77;i++){ for(var i2=0;i2<77;i2++){ x.push(Math.pow(i,i2)); } } document.getElementById("aaa1").innerHTML=x;
MYpow
var x=[]; for(var i=0;i<77;i++){ for(var i2=0;i2<77;i2++){ x.push(MYpow(i,i2)); } } document.getElementById("aaa1").innerHTML=x;
MYpow2
var x=[]; for(var i=0;i<77;i++){ for(var i2=0;i2<77;i2++){ x.push(MYpow2(i,i2)); } } document.getElementById("aaa1").innerHTML=x;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.pow
MYpow
MYpow2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 107 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Math.pow	333.7 Ops/sec
MYpow	435.1 Ops/sec
MYpow2	749.1 Ops/sec

Math.pow vs for loop for integer powers (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Math.pow vs MYpow vs MYpow2

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Math.pow

MYpow

MYpow2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A