Benchmark: String accumulation using forEach vs. map+join vs. reduce

Script Preparation code:

var property = "justify-content";
var value = ["space-around", "space-evenly"];

function normalizeDeclaration(property, value) {
	return property + ":" + value;
}

Tests:

forEach
var cssText = ""; value.forEach((fallbackValue) => { cssText += "" + normalizeDeclaration(property, fallbackValue); }); var result = cssText.slice(1);
map+join
var result = value .map((fallbackValue) => normalizeDeclaration(property, fallbackValue)) .join(";");
reduce
var result = value.reduce( (accumulator, fallbackValue) => accumulator + ";" + normalizeDeclaration(property, fallbackValue), normalizeDeclaration(property, value[0]) );

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
forEach
map+join
reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/84.0.4147.105 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 84 on Mac OS X 10.15.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
forEach	2137534.0 Ops/sec
map+join	1851201.0 Ops/sec
reduce	1427630.0 Ops/sec

String accumulation using forEach vs. map+join vs. reduce (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: forEach vs map+join vs reduce

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

forEach

map+join

reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A