window.a = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
const r = [a].join('.*?')
const r = a.split('').join('.*?')
const r = a.replace(/(.)/g, '$1*?')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
spread | |
split | |
replace |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
spread | 606747.1 Ops/sec |
split | 595200.4 Ops/sec |
replace | 353789.1 Ops/sec |
I'll explain the benchmark and its options.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON defines a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares three different string operations:
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
).split
method.replace
method.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these three operations on different strings, specifically "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
.
spread
option creates a new array by spreading the characters of the input string.split
option splits the characters of the input string into an array using the default separator ( whitespace).replace
option replaces each character in the input string with another string.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
split
method, which splits a string into an array using a specified separator.split
method, which might not be optimized for performance in all browsers.replace
method to replace each character in the input string with another string.Library Used
None explicitly mentioned. However, the benchmark uses the built-in split
and replace
methods, which are part of the JavaScript language specification.
Special JS Features or Syntax
No special features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to these operations:
Array.from()
or String.prototype.split()
.split
operation, you could also use a custom separator or regular expression pattern.replace
operation, you could use a different replacement strategy, such as using a callback function or modifying the original string in place.Keep in mind that these alternatives might change the performance characteristics of the benchmark results.