var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 ].push(params);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 3902981.2 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 6987311.0 Ops/sec |
Push | 8726204.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what is being tested in the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Purpose: The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of three different methods for concatenating arrays in JavaScript:
Array.prototype.concat()
...
)push()
with spread operator (...
)These three approaches are compared to determine which one is the most efficient.
Options Comparison:
Array.prototype.concat()
: This method takes an array as an argument and returns a new array that contains all elements from both arrays....
): This method uses the spread operator (three dots ...
) to create a new array by copying all elements from an existing array.push()
with Spread Operator (...
): This method uses the push()
method to add elements to an array, followed by the spread operator to copy all elements from an existing array.Library/Function Used: None. The benchmark only involves standard JavaScript functions and operators.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
The benchmark uses the spread operator (...
), which is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This syntax allows for creating new arrays by copying elements from an existing array.
Other Considerations:
ExecutionsPerSecond
metric to measure performance, which may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios where context switching and other factors can impact performance.Alternatives: There are alternative approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript, such as:
Array.prototype.reduce()
to concatenate two arraysString.prototype.concat()
if the elements being concatenated are stringsHowever, these alternatives may not be suitable for all use cases or performance-critical applications.
In summary, the benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different methods for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: Array.prototype.concat()
, spread operator (...
), and push()
with spread operator (...
). The results provide insight into which approach is most efficient on a desktop device with Chrome 83.