<a id="parent" >
<span id="child">Need span</span>
<svg class="icon md-16 icon-shevron-right text-muted"></svg>
</a>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.js'></script>
var $element = $("#parent");
$element.find("span");
$("#child");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
find with tag selector | |
find with id |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
find with tag selector | 1147700.8 Ops/sec |
find with id | 2597409.2 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its options.
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches for selecting elements in a jQuery document: using an ID selector (#id
) versus a tag selector (tag
). The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
Script Preparation Code
Before running the benchmark, the script preparation code sets up a jQuery object $element
that references an HTML element with the ID parent
. This setup ensures that both test cases access the same DOM node.
Html Preparation Code
The HTML preparation code includes two elements: one with the ID parent
, which will be used as the reference point, and another span
element inside it, which will serve as the target for selection. The script also includes the jQuery library from a CDN.
Benchmark Options
There are two benchmark options being compared:
$element.find("span")
: This option uses a tag selector to find all elements with the name "span" within the $element
. Since the span
element is nested inside the $element
, this approach might be slower because jQuery needs to traverse the DOM tree.$("#child")
: This option uses an ID selector to directly select the #child
element, which is a descendant of the $element
.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
$element.find("span")
:$("#child")
:Library and Its Purpose
The jQuery
library is used for its DOM manipulation and selection capabilities. In this benchmark, jQuery's selector engine is used to find the elements.
Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to write a similar benchmark, you could also consider using other libraries or frameworks for DOM manipulation and selection. For example:
VanillaJS
: You can use vanilla JavaScript methods like document.querySelector
, document.querySelectorAll
, or getElementsByClassName
.React
or Angular
: These frameworks provide their own set of APIs for selecting and manipulating elements in the DOM.Keep in mind that each framework has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the performance characteristics may vary depending on the specific use case and implementation details.