let updates = [5, 23, 42]
const removedItems = []
if (removedItems.length) {
updates = updates.filter((id) => !removedItems.includes(id));
}
const removedItems = []
const updates = [5, 23, 42].filter((id) => !removedItems.includes(id));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
with if-check | |
without if-check |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
with if-check | 223021536.0 Ops/sec |
without if-check | 35709120.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and what pros and cons come with each approach.
Benchmark Purpose
The primary goal of this benchmark is to measure the performance difference in removing items from an array using two different methods: with an if
check and without it. The focus is on comparing the execution speed of these two approaches.
Script Preparation Code
There is no script preparation code provided, which means that the JavaScript engine will start executing the benchmark scripts from scratch for each test run. This approach can help isolate the test results from any external factors that might influence the outcome, such as caching or previous function calls.
Comparison of Approaches
The two approaches being compared are:
if
check: The code uses an if
statement to check if removedItems
has length before filtering the updates
array.if (removedItems.length) {
updates = updates.filter((id) => !removedItems.includes(id));
}
Pros:
Cons:
without if-check
approach.if
check: The code uses a simple array filter method without any condition.const updates = [5, 23, 42].filter((id) => !removedItems.includes(id));
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
The filter()
method is a built-in JavaScript function that iterates over an array and applies a callback function to each element. The purpose of this function is to create a new array with only the elements that pass the test implemented by the provided function.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark scripts. They use standard JavaScript syntax and built-in functions.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches for removing items from an array include:
slice()
method: const updates = [5, 23, 42].slice(removedItems.length);
reduce()
method: const updates = [5, 23, 42].reduce((acc, id) => { if (!removedItems.includes(id)) acc.push(id); return acc; }, []);
Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may have different performance characteristics and might not be suitable for all use cases.
In the context of this benchmark, the filter()
method is likely to be the most efficient approach, as it provides a concise and expressive way to filter arrays. However, if the condition is known to be false for certain elements, using slice()
or reduce()
might lead to slightly slower execution times.