Benchmark: Testing lodash some vs get

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['sent'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
  { status: ['draft'] },
]

Tests:

Original
for (const assignment of arr) { if (_.get(assignment, 'status[0]') !== 'sent') { hasInvalidStatus = true; break; } }
Lodash
_.some(arr, a=>a.status[0]!== 'sent');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Original
Lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/83.0.4103.116 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 83 on Mac OS X 10.14.5

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Original	1440153.8 Ops/sec
Lodash	3888207.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested on it, along with the pros and cons of different approaches.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition provides information about the test case. In this case, there are two individual test cases: "Original" and "Lodash". The test case uses a JavaScript array `arr` containing multiple objects with a `status` property. The goal is to check if any object in the array has a status of 'sent' using two different approaches:

1. **Original**: This approach uses a traditional `for...of` loop and checks each assignment individually.
2. **Lodash**: This approach uses the popular JavaScript utility library Lodash, specifically its `some()` function.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare the performance of these two approaches:

* Traditional loop with conditional break (Original)
* Lodash's `some()` function

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Traditional Loop (Original)**
	* Pros:
		+ Easy to understand and implement
		+ No external dependencies required
	* Cons:
		+ Can be slower due to the overhead of individual checks
		+ May not be as efficient for large datasets
2. **Lodash's `some()` Function (Lodash)**
	* Pros:
		+ Highly optimized and efficient
		+ Supports larger datasets without significant performance drops
		+ Easy to use with existing Lodash knowledge
	* Cons:
		+ Requires an external dependency (Lodash)
		+ May have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with the library

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks, such as:

* Array manipulation (`some()`, `every()`, etc.)
* String manipulation (string concatenation, template literals, etc.)
* Object manipulation (property access, modification, etc.)
* Functional programming utilities (map, reduce, filter, etc.)

Lodash is widely used in the JavaScript community due to its versatility and ease of use.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None mentioned.

**Other Alternatives**

If you prefer not to use Lodash or want to explore other options, here are some alternatives:

* **Array.prototype.some()**: This method is part of the Array prototype and can be used as an alternative to Lodash's `some()` function.
* **ES6 `some()` function**: The `some()` function is a built-in JavaScript function that returns `true` if at least one element in the array satisfies the provided condition.

These alternatives may not offer the same level of performance or utility as Lodash, but they can provide a more lightweight and self-contained solution for specific use cases.

Related benchmarks:

Testing lodash some vs get (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Original vs Lodash

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Original

Lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):