Benchmark: Array.find vs lodash _.includes vs compiled regex

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var strings = [
    'one', 'two', 'three'
]
var regex = /^(one|two|three)$/;

var input = 'three'

Tests:

array find
// Native !!strings.find(function (o) { return o == input; })
_.find
!!_.find(users, function (o) { return o==input; })
regex
regex.test(input)
regex (i)
regex.test(input)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array find
_.find
regex
regex (i)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 16_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.5.2 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 16 on iOS 16.5.1

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
array find	7071586.0 Ops/sec
_.find	0.0 Ops/sec
regex	12618060.0 Ops/sec
regex (i)	12069680.0 Ops/sec

Array.find vs lodash _.includes vs compiled regex (version: 0)

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

Comparing performance of: array find vs _.find vs regex vs regex (i)

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

array find

_.find

regex

regex (i)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A