<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
var values = new Array(200 * 200 * 4);
var chunks = _.chunk(values, 4);
var chunks = [];
for (var i = 0; i < values.length; i += 4) {
chunks.push(values.slice(i, i + 4));
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash | |
native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash | 80.8 Ops/sec |
native | 44.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches:
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
chunk
function, which splits an array into smaller chunks.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Library (Lodash)
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as:
chunk
(which is used in this benchmark)Lodash's purpose is to provide a set of reusable functions that can simplify code and improve performance. In the context of this benchmark, Lodash's implementation of the chunk
function is used to compare its performance with a native implementation.
Special JS Feature/ Syntax
There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript features like arrays, loops, and function calls.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to chunking an array, some options include:
Array.prototype.reduce()
or Array.prototype.forEach()
Keep in mind that each approach has its own trade-offs and use cases. This benchmark aims to compare the performance of Lodash's implementation with a native implementation, providing a baseline for other approaches.
I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.