htmlstring = '<div class="pie"><a href="example.com"></div><br><p>blah</p><div class="something"><p>content</p></div>'
$(document.body).append($(htmlstring));
$(document.body).append($.parseHTML(htmlstring));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery(htmlstring) | |
jQuery.parseHTML(htmlstring) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery(htmlstring) | 17873.7 Ops/sec |
jQuery.parseHTML(htmlstring) | 2948.1 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test between two approaches: jQuery's htmlstring
and parseHTML
methods for manipulating HTML strings. The goal is to measure which method is faster, more efficient, or provides better performance.
Test Case Options Compared
In this case, we have two primary options being compared:
append()
method on the document.body
element, passing an HTML string (htmlstring
) as an argument.parseHTML()
method to parse the HTML string (htmlstring
) and then appends the resulting HTML structure to the document.body
.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
append()
which can cause unnecessary DOM modifications.Library and Purpose
In this case, jQuery is used as a library for manipulating HTML strings. Specifically:
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark.
Alternative Approaches
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:
Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preferences.