const array = []
const sorted = array.length ? array.sort((a, b) => a - b ) : array
const array = []
const sorted = array.sort((a, b) => a - b )
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Checked | |
Un-Checked |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Checked | 1229405056.0 Ops/sec |
Un-Checked | 28543930.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the provided JavaScript benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for sorting an empty array in JavaScript: one with explicit length check (checked
) and another without it (unchecked
). The goal is to determine which approach is faster, assuming a modern JavaScript engine.
Options Compared
In this benchmark, there are only two options being compared:
Checked
: This option uses an explicit length check before sorting the array. It checks if the array has a non-zero length and only sorts it if so.Unchecked
: This option does not perform any length check before sorting the array.Pros and Cons
Library and Special JS Features
In this benchmark, no external libraries are used, and there are no special JavaScript features mentioned (e.g., async/await, Promises, etc.). The focus is solely on comparing two simple array sorting approaches.
Alternative Approaches
If you were to create a similar benchmark for a different scenario, you might want to consider the following alternatives:
Array.prototype.sort()
versus a custom sorting function.Benchmark Preparation Code
The provided preparation code consists of two simple JavaScript scripts:
checked
and unchecked
approaches.unchecked
approach, which is likely intended to be compared against the checked
approach.Other Considerations
When running benchmarks like this one, it's essential to keep in mind: