const condition = true;
let counter = 0;
if (condition)
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) counter += i;
else
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) counter += counter;
const condition = true;
let counter = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) counter += condition ? i : counter;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
outside | |
inside |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
outside | 78715120.0 Ops/sec |
inside | 79016392.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The provided Benchmark Definition json represents a simple benchmark that measures the performance difference between two approaches: executing an if-else statement inside or outside a loop.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
condition ? i : counter
) to assign a value to counter
based on the condition.Pros and Cons
Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries mentioned in the Benchmark Definition json. However, the ternary operator (condition ? i : counter
) uses a special JavaScript feature called "conditional operator" or "ternary operator," which allows for concise expression of simple if-else statements.
Other Considerations
The choice between inside and outside approaches depends on the specific requirements of the application. If accuracy is more important than performance, using the outside approach may be preferred. However, if speed is critical, the inside approach might be a better choice.
Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative benchmarks or approaches, MeasureThat.net offers a wide range of benchmarks and tests on various JavaScript features and libraries. Some examples include:
Keep in mind that the specific options and alternatives will depend on the benchmark definition json and the desired scope of the test.