Benchmark: Vanilla JS, Cash and jQuery - SetText Speed Test

Vanilla JS, Cash and jQuery - SetText Speed Test (version: 15)

Comparing performance of: Vanilla JS .innerText vs Vanilla JS .innerHTML vs Vanilla JS .textContent vs Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerText vs Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerHTML vs Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .textContent vs Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerText vs Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerHTML vs Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .textContent vs Cash .text vs Cash .html vs jQuery .text() vs jQuery .html() vs jQuery .find() .text() vs jQuery .find() .html()

Created: 8 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"><script>
<script>jQuery.noConflict();</script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/cash/7.0.3/cash.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

AخA
 
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"><script>
<script>jQuery.noConflict();</script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/cash/7.0.3/cash.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Tests:

Vanilla JS .innerText
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.innerText = "New Hello World";
var el = document.getElementById("foo");
el.innerText = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS .innerHTML
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
var el = document.getElementById("foo");
el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS .textContent
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.textContent = "New Hello World";
var el = document.getElementById("foo");
el.textContent = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerText
var el = document.querySelector("#foo"); el.innerText = "New Hello World";
var el = document.querySelector("#foo");
el.innerText = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerHTML
var el = document.querySelector("#foo"); el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
var el = document.querySelector("#foo");
el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .textContent
var el = document.querySelector("#foo"); el.textContent = "New Hello World";
var el = document.querySelector("#foo");
el.textContent = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerText
var el = document.querySelectorAll("#foo"); el.innerText = "New Hello World";
var el = document.querySelectorAll("#foo");
el.innerText = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerHTML
var el = document.querySelectorAll("#foo"); el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
var el = document.querySelectorAll("#foo");
el.innerHTML = "New Hello World";
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .textContent
var el = document.querySelectorAll("#foo"); el.textContent = "New Hello World"
var el = document.querySelectorAll("#foo");
el.textContent = "New Hello World"
Cash .text
$("#foo").text("New Hello World");
$("#foo").text("New Hello World");
Cash .html
$("#foo").html("New Hello World");
$("#foo").html("New Hello World");
jQuery .text()
jQuery("#foo").text("New Hello World");
jQuery("#foo").text("New Hello World");
jQuery .html()
jQuery("#foo").html("New Hello World");
jQuery("#foo").html("New Hello World");
jQuery .find() .text()
jQuery(document).find("#foo").text("New Hello World");
jQuery(document).find("#foo").text("New Hello World");
jQuery .find() .html()
jQuery(document).find("#foo").html("New Hello World");
jQuery(document).find("#foo").html("New Hello World");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Experimental features:

Memory measurements supported only in Chrome.
For precise memory measurements Chrome must be launched with --enable-precise-memory-info flag.
More information: Monitoring JavaScript Memory

Test case name	Result
Vanilla JS .innerText
Vanilla JS .innerHTML
Vanilla JS .textContent
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerText
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerHTML
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .textContent
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerText
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerHTML
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .textContent
Cash .text
Cash .html
jQuery .text()
jQuery .html()
jQuery .find() .text()
jQuery .find() .html()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/108.0.1462.54

Browser/OS: Chrome 108 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Vanilla JS .innerText	799643.3 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS .innerHTML	217774.4 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS .textContent	2562020.5 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerText	667477.2 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .innerHTML	225253.2 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS (QuerySelector) .textContent	1628098.0 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerText	707854.1 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .innerHTML	254256.3 Ops/sec
Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll) .textContent	220475.0 Ops/sec
Cash .text	570746.7 Ops/sec
Cash .html	224745.7 Ops/sec
jQuery .text()	408341.2 Ops/sec
jQuery .html()	206923.0 Ops/sec
jQuery .find() .text()	312293.7 Ops/sec
jQuery .find() .html()	184321.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 5 months ago):

I'll provide the answer directly:

The provided JSON data appears to be a list of web performance test results, likely from a browser benchmarking platform such as Snyk or Chrome DevTools.

Here are some observations and insights based on this data:

Browser and device: The tests were run using Google Chrome 108 on Windows desktop devices.
Test types: There are several JavaScript-related test categories:
- jQuery (.text() and .find().text())
- Vanilla JS (QuerySelectorAll and QuerySelector)
- Cache-based testing ($.html and $._cache.html)
Performance metrics:
- ExecutionsPerSecond: The number of executions per second for each test.
- TestName: A brief description of the test being run.

If you're looking for specific insights or analysis, please let me know what you'd like to know!

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Related benchmarks: