Benchmark: indexOf sorted vs non-sorted

Script Preparation code:

var t1 = [], tval = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++){
  var x = ""+Math.random();
  t1.push(x);
  
  var x2 = ""+Math.random();
  tval.push(x2);
}

Tests:

non-sorted
for (var j of tval){ t1.indexOf(j) }
sorted
var t2 = t1.sort() for (var j of tval){ t2.indexOf(j) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
non-sorted
sorted

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 57 on Windows 7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
non-sorted	5795.7 Ops/sec
sorted	6295.5 Ops/sec

indexOf sorted vs non-sorted (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: non-sorted vs sorted

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

non-sorted

sorted

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A